What Is Anglo German Agreementadmin
The Helgoland-Zanzibar Treaty (German: Helgoland-Zanzibar Treaty) was an agreement signed on 1 July 1890 between the German Empire and Great Britain. On May 22, 1935, the British cabinet voted to officially resurrect Hitler`s offer on 21 May.  Sir Eric Phipps, the United Kingdom`s ambassador to Berlin, advised London that „due to French short-sightedness“ no chance of a maritime agreement with Germany be lost.  Chatfield informed the firm that it was very unwise to „refuse [Hitler`s] offer, but the Reactions of the French towards them are more uncertain and their reaction to our own battleship replacement even more so.“  g) Because it is very unlikely that the calculation of 35 percent. For each category of vessels, tonnages must be indicated exactly by the maximum tonnage allowed for vessels in this category, and adjustments may be necessary to ensure that Germany is not excluded from the full use of its tonnage. It was therefore agreed that the German Government and Her Majesty`s Government in the United Kingdom would agree on the necessary accommodations to do so and it is considered that this procedure will not result in a substantial or permanent deviation from the 35:100 ratio to overall levels. June 1935 was a maritime agreement between Great Britain and Germany that regulated the size of the navy with regard to the Royal Navy. In January 1933 Hitler became German chancellor. The new German government had inherited in Geneva a strong negotiating position from the previous government of General Kurt von Schleicher. The German strategy was to make idealistic offers for limited rearmament, sketching that all these offers would be rejected by the French, so that Germany could finally continue with maximum rearmament. The ultranationalism of the Nazi regime had alerted the French, who put in the armour the most minimal interpretation possible of the German „theoretical equality“, thus alluding to the German strategy.
In October 1933, the Germans left the conference again and declared that all the others should either disarm at Versailles or allow Germany to equip itself beyond Versailles.  Although the Germans never had a serious interest in accepting any of the United Kingdom`s various compromise proposals in London, the German exit was largely attributed, albeit incorrectly, to French „intransigence“. The British government has been left to the conviction that in the future, the possibilities of arms control talks with the Germans should not be lost because of French „intransigence“. The UK`s subsequent proposals to organize Germany`s return to the World Conference on Disarmament were sabotaged by the Germans who made proposals to challenge the United Kingdom, even though they were unacceptable to the French. On 17 April 1934, the last such effort ended with the rejection of the recent German offer by the French Foreign Minister, Louis Barthou, whom the so-called „Barthou“ note called unacceptable, ending French participation in the conference, while declaring that France would take care of its own security properly.